Tag Archive: Directing


My undergraduate study (well one of them) was directing for stage. This of course was complimented by classes in Musical Theatre, Radio/TV Production, Film theory…

Directing is my first love. Once I get a cast into a rehearsal hall I am in ecstasy. I can pummel 15 minutes of a show for 3 hours and find driving emotions from a performer. I can buzz thru 45 minutes of material in 5 minutes and not lose the quality of a scene. It’s all a question of focus.

But enough threats to people I will soon work with 😉

One of the things that is rare to most of us in theatre, tv, and non-professional film production is ‘pre-casting.’ Pre-casting is where one can take the media and say, “I want X to play the role.”

I actually learned the process from my father (who had pretty much 0 contact with media). His favourite book was “The Stand” {i’ve never been able to make it thru anything by King}. He’d re-read the book every 2 years to then talk about ‘who should be in the movie.’

Many people like to play the pre-cast game. Certain media begs for it. Among my favourites that are (were) continually pre-cast by the public are: “Wrinkle in Time”, “The Endless/Sandman Series”, “X-Men”… and so forth. (Note: I’ve given up on Annie Lennox playing Desire.. She’s too old now. I guess I’ll just have to go with Tilda Swinton)

Of course then you get into “Hell-casting” where you pick the worst coupling of Director and Media and then decide how they’d cast it. “Spike Lee directs The Music Man with Eddie Murphy as Harold Hill and Chris Rock as the annoying kid with a lisp that Ron Howard played.”

Try a few of these Hell Castings if you like
Stanley Kubrick directs Pee Wee’s Big Adventure
M. Night Shyamalan directs Gone with the Wind
Tim Burton directs Cats (hrmn.)
George A. Romero directs Rent
Oliver Stone directs The Crow
and of course
Steven Speilberg and George Lucas co direct Mary Poppins
But I digress.

DaVinci Code was a stickler for me. I knew before I even read the book that Tom Hanks was hands down the absolute worst casting ever done.

Well, this is if we define casting as “Who is the best actor to represent the character in the book” If we define casting as, “In the hollywood political substructure, which name will counterbalance our budget with a guaranteed return to make this an instant blockbuster in the first few weeks until the word of mouth kills our revenue flow”

But to be honest… I couldn’t find an actor that worked for me. I was happy with one choice from the film. I was begrudgingly okay with another… but I wanted my perfect cast. Who would have made the film scream for me? When I do this kind of casting I do not think of budgets, name quality, politics. I put actor vs. actor based on what I’ve seen them do.

While ranting about tDvC last night I finally got my answers:

oh yes… and before you read…
Yes, virginia. There are spoilers.

How would Andrei Cast the Davinci Code?

It’s interesting. Part of the reason I left L.A. was to get away from the fabricated world. How ever, any big city art scene is going to have fabricated people. By fabricated, I mean that people make themselves up to be what they think will be noticeable and appreciable rather than an extension of themselves.

We walked through several artists showings. The people in attendance at these things all looked like they were trying to put on the aire of the perfect artiste. I saw one young guy who had his hair styled in a half-pompodore on top with edge lines cut out horizontally along the sides of his head. His outfit defies any description beyond, “You spent at least 5 hours in the thrift store picking each piece that you felt would make a statement.” I evesdropped a conversation he was having with a pixie that I could not gender to save my own life. Sie was tiny and blonde and had a biiig pink handkerchief hanging out of her right pocket. (And you know what that means, girlfriends!) Sadly upon listining to the conversation I realized that pompodope was about as deep as your 4 year old’s Sesame Street plastic, summer pool.

The artwork showed promise. only two pieces really leaped out at me and said, “This is really good” Many of the artists also displayed pieces that felt more like they were trying to capture a statement that would be well received rather than digging into their inner soul to produce something from them. shimmeringjemmy and I had long conversations about artwork we saw. I was glad to be able to draw back on my Theatrical training and a wonderful course in articulating artistic opinion (called, ‘contemporary drama’) to give fairly deep and intelligent commentary about the art we saw. Translation: yup, I too can be an art critic.

The highlight (or lowlight if you will) of the evening was the arrival of the angry clown posse.Picture 1, Picture 2. While standing at the entrance of one building of gallery like offices in an alley on the ArtWalk, we heard a demonstration. Several people dressed as clowns were picketing. The signs and the yells were along the idea of, “Art is Theory”, “Down with Art” “Art is a myth!”, “Down with Dali!”, “Kiss my picAsso.” The lead clown had a megaphone. They all had the requisite bike horn. This was amusing for about 10 seconds. For me the amusement ceased when some irate art snot decided to throw a cup of either water or white wine down on the demonstrators below. My amusement ended because the dumping missed the clowns entirely and landed on shimmeringjemmy and I instead.

The clowns proceeded to go into galleries with their rigamarole (Thank the Gods for spell checkers, I always wondered how that was spelt) The demonstration became less and less humourous to me. Especially when they’d boisterously crowd into a gallery, spout their message, and make it utterly impossible for any other patron to actually look at the art on display. There was a lot of shoving (not the “intentionally aggressive” kind, more of the “big city, I just don’t care what I do” kind). I contemplated (for about a minute) analyzing the demonstration as art. Perhaps how I’d appeal to one of them about the frivolity of calling anything in our world “theory”. I contemplated how a true clown would act the fool and not even acknowledge debate or argument, and decided to do my best to avoid them.

They stayed in acoustically unfortunate areas so their clambouring and honking was overtly noticeable. One of the people I met during the evening fashioned herself a writer (and I am also told a kink model.) We talked about the flurry of art-smush-speak I could come up with expressing the “abstract dichotomy of a clown’s lack of inhibition to rebel against an inner conflict over the definition… blah blah blah.”

Then the director kicked in. I was annoyed by the clowns… I went to the happy place in my brain and took out my toys, and started cutting the scene.

This didn’t happen, but it would have been sooooo sweet.

Eye on actors

I’ve never been the largest fan of Jeffrey Tambor.

As an actor, I’ve often felt he’s just shown up, done his lines, and moved on. Mostly he’s been used for fill in roles.

Having more time on my hands I’ve been able to watch cable again and see some random movies I’d blown off the first time. This morning’s flick was “Meet Joe Black” An interesting film with a fairly strong cast. My opinion of the film is on gold as I find myself writing this entry during the love scene. It was poignant and poetic, but I really feel like the director could have done more with the scene.

I started writing because Tambor has a scene with a supporting actor where the emotion for the scene can only be described as golden. I may have to reconsider his work.