Category: Media


Just a short note; the next two parts (Groups 3&2 and Group 1) are written, they just need to be edited and annotated. Sadly, today at work my energy from my precious two weeks gave out and I haven’t really had the energy to finish them. Hopefully, I will have them up tomorrow and then the follow up posting on Monday’s episode 6 later in the week.

I hope readers are enjoying them. I’d love feedback, agreements, disagreements, suggestions. You know the usual waste of time.

Thanks

At the time this was written, Season 3 of “The Sing-Off” has eight groups left. In my previous post, I knocked off Delilah and The Yellow Jackets as the groups that will be eliminated on tonight’s episode. This leaves my pick of six going forwards after tonight.

In this post I will give my bottom three in a rough order and then in the last of these 3 posts list my top 3 and my current order. Of course any performance by any group can change things. But at this point I think trending can be a good indicator of expectations.

The bottom three of six that I have eliminate the remaining two college groups: Vocal Point and the Dartmouth Aires as well as The Collective. I will hazard at this point that I do like all 6 remaining groups. The bottom three is actually much harder for me than the top three.
The reason they are hard is that I am all over the place in the bottom three with one group that I’ll list last in this set.

First, then is Vocal Point. This is a great men’s sound. And I must admit some horrible prejudice going in knowing they were from Brigham Young. But first week and “Jump Jive n Wail” won me over. And this was without a strong Baritone in the middle. The sound was a touch tinny but this was okay. They had a great beat box and a good arrangement of voices. Then came “Never say Never.” Good funk, good sound. Then “The Way You Look Tonight” which took me completely off guard. I was not expecting Sinatra. At this point I thought that Vocal Point was headed for top notch contender. They were a force to be reckoned with. Finally they brought in “Footloose” as a guilty pleasure. And Vocal Point lost me. Footloose made me realise that every song they do is “Safe.” Safe isn’t bad; but safe is only going to sell albums to a small sector. Last year was won by Committed who did ‘safe’ but completely made it feel unsafe in places. Footloose and Sinatra were amazing but had no “sex.” Footloose also showed that glee club underpinnings that is always a danger to college groups. I was thrilled to hear their Baritone back in the group and it rounded out their sound but may have contributed to the sound taking a step backwards.

The other college group is the Dartmouth Aires. Of the college groups, the Aires have done the best job of keeping away from the “Wall of Sound” even when they play footsie with the glee club sounds. The Aires also have a lot of versatility in having multiple strong lead singers. Week one’s “Higher Ground” had some fun with an almost “Hair” like rendition. “Animal” got very far from the glee sound and sounded like something uniquely original to an album. In escaping glee it tripped close to Wall of Sound but had some amazing dynamic and arrangement to keep it safe. “Pinball Wizard” really wanted to succeed. It had some amazing bass. It also suffered from when great singers face off against rock vocals and while enunciation is great, you have to make sure that you don’t loose too much grit. The lead singer also didn’t quite hit all the notes you wanted. Judge Shawn Stockman identified this one as a bit “Flarpy” (flats and sharps). “Jessie’s Girl” showed that each vocalist is a hidden treasure for the group. The lead kept surprising me by going higher and higher.

As much as I like the Aires, both they and Vocal Point again suffer from the same problem that took North Shore out earlier. There isn’t a sound that steps them away from other groups doing the same thing that would make me think of getting albums especially from them.

That third group that’s been knocking me around is “The Collective” I group the Collective with the two college groups because I don’t think they’ll make the final 3 considering who they are up against and at the same time, I can’t tell if they’ll beat these two college groups or fall to them. Collective has a great sound. AS pointed out… well produced. But at the same time; this has been a blessing and a curse giving what is probably the most variety of quality of any of the remaining six. Their great has been great; their not so great has been very not so great. “Rolling In the Deep” was an amazing creation that just made me intrigued by their sound. Great beatbox and haunting vocals. The chording however seemed a bit ‘splayed.’ “Rocketeer“, never really took wings. It had a lot of potential to really rock, but it always felt about a step behind where it could be. The lead vocal also sounded scared of the song. “Hold On, I’m Comin’” was fun. Technically it was right where it was supposed to be. This is a plus for not having distracitons; this is a minus because nothing about it made me have a ‘Wow’ moment. Then came “I Will Survive.” I was really worried as it came in because I found the vocals too light. But in retrospect; they were amazing. The vocal blend is settling in. The two female voices work VERY well together. My concern is this came too late. They really need to do something beyond amazing to break the top 3 at this point.

Next post. This leaves in alphabetical order: Afro Blue, Pentatonix, and Urban Method. I have a definite order for these three… see how close or far I am.

I’m really not a fan of reality shows. So of course I feel dirty when I find ones that I get entirely invested in. For the second season in a row I am very actively following “Ths Sing-Off“. The basic premise of the show is competing A capella groups. This season it was 16 groups going for a prize of a Sony recording contract and $200K.

I suppose we’re at the halfway point because we’re down to eight groups. I want to assess the groups that got dropped last week and where I think the remaining eight rank.

Last week we said goodbye to the classic doo wop of “North Shore” and the “University of Delaware Deltones”.

I have to admit; initially I was very surprised that “North Shore” got dropped. In retrospect I’m actually very much in support. While I enjoyed what they did to Huey Lewis’ “Power of Love” I have to admit that Huey Lewis has always been Doo Wop and this was an example of “North Shore” once again pulling a song to them rather than really pushing their style into a different sound. I think this was also the detriment that finally took down “Jerry Lawson and Talk of The Town” last season. Make no mistake; both these groups are professional, tight, and amazing to listen to.

The problem and this will form the basis of my evaluation throughout is that the prize comes down to that Sony Contract. The winner needs to have unique marketability to break thru and sell albums. I feel that both these groups, as outstanding as they are, are not unique in sound. I can find at least five groups that do these vocal stylings and it’d be very hard to remember which group is which. And I want a winner that is going to sell me a record on name recognition alone after I hear them.

“The University of Delaware Deltones” – were sadly being more and more out-classed as the competition went on. You could tell there was a young sound that really hadn’t found their unique voice. Episode 4 brought a reasonalble but unoriginal cover of “You Can’t Hurry Love” which left them pretty low ranked in my list and in my laser sites for the following show. For “Guilty Pleasures” they went with Roxette’s “Listen to Your Heart.” I think as far as the show theme; this alone was a bad decision. It’s a reasonable adult contemporary gold song and doesn’t lend itself for doing something that will make the audience go, “Oh cool.” Further; the Deltones suffered from two consistant problems of College groups. First is the Glee club sound. They sound like an academic group singing together for fun and mild entertainment; not a professional career. Secondarily, when a group gets too large they suffer from “Wall of Sound” With their performance this week, there was lead vocals and just one giant chord behind it that was overly heavy. And with a song as delicate as this Roxette number; there needed to be far more delicate treatment of the backing.

So what’s left and who’s going first?

First off, I think “Delilah” is done this week.

I saw week one after week two. But when I finally got to week one I was BLOWN AWAY by “Grenade.” Presentation, style, music, power, and to be very shallow; not hard on the eyes at all. Delilah came out with an explosive performance to prove that “Sweet Adelines” don’t have to be sweet anymore. Delilah has an amazing lead vocallist and a bass that reminds me of one of my very favourite all female acapella groups “The Mint Juleps.” Week 2 brought us “Whataya Want from Me” and “(Love is Like A) Heat Wave“. The former showed fantastic dynamic but gave me the feeling that not all of Delilah were “Lead Singer” material. They also proved that they were stronger on the hard than the light. “Heat Wave” was my first Delilah disappointment. There was really little departure from the original apart from occassional flourish. Again… I missed the lead singer from Grenade. While the the other vocalists have good voices, they don’t have the same power and presence. Heat Wave simply left me bored. Finally, in “Flashdance“, Delilah stayed close to the original and didn’t so much depart as not replicate. For an all-female group I was VERY surprised that the backing chords didn’t feel like they were missing parts. Delilah also surprised me in that this rendition didn’t have the punch I was expecting from the song. Again, the song felt like it suffered from a lead that just couldn’t deliver the impact. I think Delilah has amazing potential; but I think they needed a year to gel and figure out where their power and pizazz were in the group before returning to “The Sing Off.”

If two groups go this week, number 2 is the University of Rochester Yellow Jackets. The YJ are fun. There is no doubt in my mind about that. However, of the remaining three college groups I think that the YJ are the ones with the weakest sound and frankly can’t compete with the remaining four non-college groups. The African tribute “Wavin’ Flag“, while appreciated and a huge departure from their typical sound, I don’t think quite connected. Frankly, it was too caucasian-sounding and a bit sharp in places. Opening week nerves are understandable but in competition that will be remembered. “Dynamite” was a good entry; but a bit too character-driven and in the words of a rude soprano, “A little high” for the lead singer. This entry also really succumbed to “Wall of Sound” which is going to be a handicap for any group over 12 people. Remembering even if you cut standard voices into first and second chair: That’s 8, 10, or 12. And 12 point harmony is VERY hard even for polished groups. YJ is NOT giving the impression of much beyond 3-4 part heavily doubled up. “Can’t Take My Eyes Off of You” was one of their strongest songs. The backing chords split well, and there was good balance in the soft areas; but in the heavier bits it did fall back into “Wall of Sound”. Kudos to good use of a lyric tenor. It’s a hard voice to work for because it is potentially a very effiminate voice style, and it’s difficult to find songs for all-male groups that don’t emasculate it. Then we end with “Wannabe“. Honestly, I think the group knew they were in danger with this one and wanted to push on the fun button of the judges. I was amused by them letting the song fall apart in organised chaos and then come back from the brink. Unfortunately, it never got away from the Wall of Sound. So I just can’t see them really pulling back or finding a more dynamic sound. YJ has a fantastic and infectious presence. To break out of that horrid glee club curse they are going to have to thin their numbers and find a unique sound that matches their unique style of presentation. As it was well put by the judges… will I love them as much when I can’t see them; only hear them?

Six more will go on… Next post: who’s left and how I think they will rank.

Aside: I’m seriously thinking of renaming my blog “Poor, little-neglected bastion of rare opinion.”

Yes, this review is chocked full of spoilers. I’ve marked where the spoilers begin; so I’m going to assume that anyone who’s opinion I care about has either seen “Tron:Legacy” or will have the intelligence to Bookmark this post and come back to it after they’ve seen it.

A bit of background. Tron (The original film) came out in 1982. For the record, I was 14 and a video game addict. I had received my first computer (an Apple ][ in 1979). I as using a modem by 1980. I was writing software (Well, if code written in Basic can be called software) by 1981. You can do the math from there. The film… “may” … have had an influence on me.

It is now nearly 30 years later. I have worked for Symantec (The Norton Folk), Microsoft (who I’m under contract to say nothing bad about), and EarthLink (The no we’re not scientologists anymore folk) Of course I look less like Kevin Flynn and more like “Tron Guy” without the penchant for trying to fit into electrical tape spandex.

It should be no surprise that I did in fact go to see “Tron: Legacy” on opening weekend.

So, the short form first, then the slightly longer than short, and then I’ll draw it all out.

The short form: I loved it.
The slightly longer than short: It was exactly what it needed to be.

Taking into account that the three years of promotion for this film this film had to either hit a target or die gloriously. Granted, the three years at Comic-con (now the longest film teaser in history) was really a showcase of special effects ideas to gauge the audience, followed by a REALLY short shooting schedule with an incomplete script and a BUTT LOAD of post-production.

Spoilers lie ahead from this point.

You couldn’t simply start a fresh story. You need to know what happened to Kevin Flynn. Coming out of Tron you get a “They lived happily ever after.” Well, okay, they don’t include Dillinger who pretty much gets the corporate boot up his ass for theft, plagiarization, and corporate thievery. But not so much that his son doesn’t land on the board. (No, no plans at all for that character; unh-uh.. nope.. BTW: I have a bridge to sell you).

Flynn, was not going to simply walk away from the Grid. Now the absent father and orphaned boy thing is old. It’s tried… at times it’s tired. And of course, orphan boy grows up to be delinquent wünderkind. Yes, I’m looking at you Chris (I’m not Shatner) Pine. But hey, if they could reboot Kirk’s Girdle with the plot; why not the reboot the… (You know, I’m just not going to go for that pun. I am not going to use “Reboot” with Tron.)

When Tron came out it was bleeding edge technology being forced into a story. This time is was a story being forced into the bleeding age of technology. Interestingly, the bleeding edge wasn’t the CGI sets, backgrounds, costumes, or games. It was giving us a young Jeff Bridges.

The facial motion capture that scared children in Polar Express; that created neurotic N’avi wannabe’s in Avatar; and aged Brad Pitt in … whatever movie that was that aged Brad Pitt; attempted to give us a look back at Kevin Flynn circa original Tron. Fortunately, unlike every other film; they had source material to draw from. UNFORTUNATELY, unlike every other film; they had source material to draw from.

The de-aging of Kevin Flynn for the character of Clu (which I suppose should actually have been named Clu 2.0… Or perhaps Clu Vista due to his expectations vs. performance) has been a hotly debated thing. Actually, in all the reviews I’ve read, it’s the number one debated issue about the film. I read a lot of: “Blah Blah, plot whatever” “Blah Blah, soundtrack vs. story” “Blah Blah, action porn vs. Message porn.” “Blah Blah HOLY F*#^ Olivia Wilde is HAWT!” (okay… maybe not so much debate over that one at all)… But the one that keeps showing up is “De-aged Jeff Bridges as CLU”

You know, when one effect is what people keep talking about… I’d call that a win. So does Clu escape the ever popular Uncanny-Valley? I personally think he spends the entire film stumbling on the edge. And to me, this is perfect. The grid isn’t real. The grid is an extension of our technology and even in his box for 30 odd years, Kevin Flynn is still a genius at what he does. So, if Clu isn’t entirely ‘right’ then that fits both the story and that character.

But enough of that specific debate.

There is one issue that I would like to soap box about. Some people have said that the movie’s problem is that it should either be an action flick or a message movie. This comment really upsets me. A few years ago a film company set out to destroy a classic piece of science fiction and yet retain the name “Rollerball.” They decided that then needed to “Drop the silly political stuff” and amp up the action. Personally, I think that Science Fiction is suffering from this new trend in “Action Porn.” Let’s have a paper thin plot so people can rent the movie and then fast forward to the “good bits” Good Science Fiction is telling the human story in a fantastical world. The action parts have far more power when they are backed by the passion of a human story. I love the new “V” but I truly miss the original linking it to the Jewish Holocaust. When in doubt: Bradbury and Asimov did it right.

Yes, the plot has holes (as author Cherie Priest puts it very well) that are mighty enough to not let light escape. Honestly, to me the hardest thing to watch was realizing that Tron:2 was Highlander:3. “Well, Gosh. We’re really not sure what to do; so let’s just keep a major character on ice the entire time and then pretty much just repeat the plot of the original maybe amping things up a notch in places.”

I may have mentioned short shooting schedule with an unfinished script. Disney actually took the nearly finished product to the Docter (sic). (Okay bad pun) They took the nearly finished film to the Pixar group and said, “It may be broke, please help fix.” Disney, honestly seemed to have as much faith going ‘into’ the project as they did with the original. “Wow, you guys are really passionate, and we know there are fans, but can we make something people will actually get and help us pay it back?”

So, we over look the holes in the script and look at what there was. Aging hippy Kevin Flynn. Bridges was the best thing in this movie hands down. Digital Clu was annoying at places but it fit as a reflection of a young hippy genius that’d had a mild taste of megalomania. Aging Flynn was even better. You could honestly see the childlike joy of the original Kevin Flynn tempered by sadness, loss, and an effort to make peace with his condition.

In some ways, I sort of look at this film as tied a little to Much Ado. Hero and Claudius are pretty much wood. While watching the dance between Beatrice and Benedict is where the real meat is. Okay.. the analogy makes sense in my head. Sam Flynn is one of those characters that probably could have been played by any of the current beau-hunks that are out there. I think Chris Pine was even considered for the role. Olivia Wilde… yes, she was poured into the outfit and is one of the current hot women out there. I’m a geek, I think I would have of course preferred Summer Glau. Because she will always kick ass better than any 10 female actresses out there except perhaps Helen Mirren in RED. But I waaaaaaay digress.

Now, the new characters worth mentioning: Rinzler and Castor/Zuse. I managed to not be spoiled. (Yes, big spoilers coming) Despite being a fan of Tron; despite having seen the film countless times; despite owning in on DVD… I utterly missed the fact that Rinzler had a T on his chest. I was completely surprised. But then again, I LOVE it when the obvious is right in front of you. I missed that Quorra was an Iso. I was there to enjoy the ride and not think. I let the story (what there was of it carry me) Rinzler was a great example of helping to clarify plot issues including some that go back to the previous film. The colours and the concept of “Repurposing a program.” I enjoy when information makes me want to rewatch a film or especially its predecessor. Rinzler’s redemption is fantastically paced and really whets the appetite for another film. (Perhaps even further misnamed “Tron”)

Castor/Zuse. My incredible spouse, wife, life-partner, socially conscious goddess the @livingartist pointed out to me a major flaw with this character that I absolutely agree with. In “Tron”, director Steven Lisberger admits to being guilty of “casting a Brit as a villain.” This type of British=Evil mentality of American filmmakers is the top contributing reason that actor Terrance Stamp left the American industry. Remember Terrance Stamp, from General Zod to Bernadette in Priscilla, Queen of the Desert.

Castor/Zuse is the current incarnation of this. The current incarnation is however (I feel) far more dangerous. Now the turncoat/morally ethical character is also flouting gender norms. Yes, Castor/Zuse is “Male” but flamboyant, eccentric, and a touch effeminate; and as a result… not really trustable. This is occurring in several mainstream films (Fifth Element). Apart from that major glitch… the entire, “I’m the big guy’s right hand… oh wait; I’m the rest of the big guy too.” I really hate that. That’s the kind of thing that needs to be set up for at least half a movie to have any worth.

The film was made (like all good reboots) for bringing in new people and appeasing the old fans. There are so many nods to the old film that you really do have to watch it twice to catch them all. It was said that you need to get this on BluRay just to catch all the Easter eggs in Flynn’s office and Sam’s boyhood bedroom. (Yes, I had the light cycle pillow) There was even a big door (though not as big as the original one.) Also, watch for the “Dumont” sign over Sam’s apartment. I think the only thing missing was a “Ram” tribute somewhere in the Grid.

One person on twitter said the only improvement they’d make to the grid was a random character walking around saying, “HELLO WORLD” to everyone they met. I like this.

In general, this film gives the hope that with a good script (Paging Mr. Whedon or 80% of the staff at Pixar) that a Tron film can now come out that has the technology and the story to give us something that will last for a VERY long time.

Was it too deep or bloated in placed? Sure. Was it pretty with a fun soundtrack? Sure. Was it a sleeper that people will go see and likely go back to and then buy on DVD. I think so. With a budget of $170(M) and a Gross of $258(M) in under 25 days. I think we can pretty well expect another installment. This time we probably won’t have a 30-year wait.

Kudos Disney and Joseph Kosinski

Final rating time. (And not just because I want the extra 50 words to round me out to a 2,000 page book report) See this in the cinema. See it on the big screen. The BIG, big screen. This film has specifically been designed to take advantage of the IMAX ratio, digital 3-D projection and surround sound system. See it multiple times and take others to see it.

“And now for something completely different.” Theatre. I love theatre. Correction: I love directing. I love pulling together an artistic whole by bringing out the technique and profession those performers, artisans, and techies can do when pushed.

Since I don’t get to step into a theatre very often. I occasionally satiate this desire by casting. For those who have lived inside a box, casting is finding the right performer for a part.

I think I picked up this from my father who was a HUGE Stephen King fan. About every few years he’d re-read “{en:The_Stand|The Stand}” and then tell me whom he would cast in it. (All of this is a rehash from an early post on LiveJournal)

But to do a casting session for my new blog I have decided to not merely push the envelope but send it into the next dimension. (Fortunately, C.O.D. is a thing of the past)

So this post’s casting session asks:

What if we were making a Live-Action “Teen Titans” film that was inspired by the recent Saturday Morning Cartoon?

Image from the Saturday Morning Cartoon: The Teen Titans

Teen Titans

Pict Actor Role Comments

Actor Role Comments

Thomas Decker

Robin
Decker has that steely-eyed look that says that eventually I will control whatever situation I’m in. He’s still got a youthful look about him and can easily play surprise as well as he can disdain.

Collins Pennie

Cyborg
Collins was actually one of the inspirations for this list. I’d done a casting a little while ago with actors from any time period, but I couldn’t find a good Cyborg. Then I saw the recent remake of Fame. Pennie has both strength as well as heart. He also has the most charismatic eyes since Levar Burton. So like Geordi LaForge, we immediately cover one of them.

Kay Panabaker

Starfire
Well, while I was stealing from Fame, I had to take Panabaker. She was marvelous both in the stage as someone young and awkward and stunning as she found her absolute inner strength. Her innocence couples wonderfully for Starfire.

Ellen Page

Raven
Out of makeup these two actresses look very similar. Granted anime girls often become interchangeable. In makeup it works, trust me 😉 And who could not fall in love for the razor sharp delivery as Juno for Page to make Raven so biting, yet adorable.

Jimmy Bennet
Beast Boy This role was one of those, “No clue… No clue… No Clue… No clue” when all of a sudden I thought about Star Trek. I thought about the kid going over the cliff, climbing up, and saying, “Is there a problem officer?” and I KNEW I had my Beast Boy.

In my head they all fit.

So, in a fit of complete fool heartiness, I edited the pictures. I wanted to get a rough look and see how I did. And now you can too. I actually ‘Photoshopped’ well, “Acorned” the photos.

Do they work? How would you cast it?

Addendum : If anyone is good at WordPress/CSS, drop me a line. No clue why my table text is so off kilter above. :-/