Here are graphic representations of several different types of mapped networks.
Fascinating
« Scientific research: M&M’s more efficient than Spheres Memetime… The music thing »
-
Recent Posts
- The Interview was fine on the day from hell 2019.01.10
- What it really means to be an American in Canada. 2018.12.06
- The Proto-Expatriate Arises 2018.12.04
- I Guess There’s Still Time for one Last Leuk 2017.09.10
- The Slow Demise of the Two Party System 2016.05.07
- Aiden’s adventure: The idea 2016.04.24
- Speaking as a Jew! Godwin-phobia needs to Stop! 2015.11.29
- I miss my loved ones today… But not because of Valentines Day 2015.02.14
Archives
Links to login or register!
poor highschoolers
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/networks/addhealth.gif
no pink-pink or blue-blue arcs.
Re: poor highschoolers
actually did find one blue-blue on the LHS. I did a cursory count, and it looks like leaf nodes are equally likely to be female as male (assuming the pink = XX and blue = XY).
Interestingly enough check out http://www.soc.washington.edu/users/stovel/Chains.pdf (if you haven’t already ca. page 16 where they explain (presumably) this graph. It is appearntly interesting b/c 52% of couples were in this clique and the structure was nearly noncyclical.
The high school “friends” map makes me somewhat uncomfortable, as I can imagine being one of those miserable dots not connected to anyone…(Fortunately I wasn’t quite in that position.) I wouldn’t have been on the other high school chart, though.
*drools*
you don’t understand. this kind of node linking stuff is like porn to me.