Tag Archive: philosophy


Wonderful quotation

I have often been accused of being a font of useless information. I collect trivia and minutia. More often than not from Media (TV, Film, Music).

The truth is, it is through popular culture that we draw the strongest analogies for representing life.

This being said, I also collect quotations.

And on and on….

I get pithy online

If there is one thing I love to chat about it is philosophy. Especially philosophy dealing with the concepts of God, faith, etc. Now, I have one tenant rule for anything I ramble on about. 93==YMMV. (I defined this after many posts using it back in March of 2003).

Understanding “93==YMMV”, here were some wonderful questions and how I responded.

So, today I got randomly asked a question.

In your Opinion – why does God (higher power) choose to leave everything ‘broken’?

This got my mind churning. I had to say simply:
balance and growth.

Now granted, I come from a definition of God which can be oversimplified to:
The limitless single totality of all things that are, were, and can be.

I then tried to explain the progress of the emanations of the tree of life from the one (one) to the two (not one) to the three (that which differs one from two), and so forth.

This culminated in me seeing Kether as like Hadit while seeing Malkuth as Nuit. Kinda my morning’s “Gnostic Clang”

This led to her next question:
So, do you think that is where the “illusion” exists of there ‘not being God’?

I chewed on it for a while and responded:

If it ain’t fixable when broken, don’t worry about breaking it; it’s already broke.

I don’t like Mondays

And as a result of insomnia….

I don’t like Mondays

Recently I was introduced to a poly concept. Before I go into what that entails I should explain that I may be the most open minded while least experienced poly out there.Oh, there may easily be people far more open minded ‘poly’s than me, but most if not all probable have more experience. In fact, the amount of time that I have spent in my life openly dating more than one person at the same time (openly) may be less than 2 months.

So, for me there have been (at least not yet) no running triads, no experimental vees. No extended families, no maps of shame, no incestuous local groups… Mind you, I’m not opposed to any of these; the time just hadn’t come for me.

The path of poly discovery came up recently when a good friend told me he was having difficulty with someone he was interested in. The situation was that she was mono and her main problem was that, “She didn’t want to be Thursday.” I’d never heard the phrase before, but it didn’t take long for the mental hamsters to jump on the merry-wheel in my brain and crank out the explanation.

The poly date book. Many people have come to the conclusion that one can only be a successful poly if you have two rather complex arts mastered. Communication and Time Management. Personally, I’ve always been of the mindset that these things have little to do with Poly and have more to do with being a functioning adult who wishes to have functional relationships.

It strikes me that we’ve gotten to the point where our relationships get boiled down into which set of definitions we can put on them. I have a sudden vision of a little bird wandering lost on in the big city, walking up to a large vehicle and asking, “Are you my primary?” It honks and the bird responds, “No, You are not my primary, you are a honk.” Somewhere between blind NRE and scheduling a dentist’s appointment there must still be the life in a relationship.

I guess it’s ironic that as far as alternative lifestyles go, people need to find a way to have a set of terms and practices to shoehorn them together. I guess this is so that people have common terms with which to flame each other and stick their fingers in their ears and point and call others, ‘bad polys.’ Sadly, I guess in all of this I’m a bit shallow. I believe in making the relationship what it is. Feeling out what is good between myself and the other person. Making sure that whatever I’m doing isn’t making someone else in my life feel bad. Growing and shaping from there. Reluctance is a part of any relationship, but there’s no reason to start with reluctance based on what, ‘everyone else does.’ You and your partner aren’t everyone else. Hell, with luck you aren’t even you partner.

Oh, right… inexperienced guru talk about managing relationships. Well, as I said earlier, communication and time management; it’s not just something you se because you’ve upped the ante… or at least the number of people who have free roam in the kitchen. Everything is time management; visiting friends, doing work, partying, staying up late, loving your mate(s) (Err, separately or all at once)… And no, I’m not great at it. Hell, I think every day is more training in learning about time management and communication. The relationship is the people who love me because I’m always aspiring to make it fulfilling for those who love me as I love them… Not because I’m trying to make it like we read on the boards.

If there has been thousands of years of poetry, music, art, etc…. all dedicated to the pursuit, failings, and lack of understanding of the human heart… does it really make sense to try to categorize and shoehorn?

93 = YMMV

I don’t like Mondays.
This of course doesn’t mean that I’m not looking forwards to Thursdays… because I am 🙂

Warning: I am as stated earlier sick. My tone and opinion may move about during this post. Such is the effect of having a gut reaction and then philosophizing as you type.

Today, on an off chance I heard a regular blogger talking about “Blogebrity“… Yes, that’s really the name.

For those who have not been touched by this ounce of Newsstand-GQ-People sensationalism, let me explain:

Blogebrity has established The connsumate list of bloggers. (Oh, for wish that blink still existed as an html tag to truly convey the hollywoodesque, dripping sarcasm, that this deserves.

Blogebrity has gone so far to create an A-List, B-List, and C-List of who YOU should be reading.

Now, I realize these comments may doom me forevermore to the just recently established “D-List”. Now, if you’ve managed to inadvertently cause a following for your writing… Bully for you. If however, there is a compelling need to transcend the list of the nameless masses to garner their favouritism… perhaps the art of blogging has taken a left turn at Albuquerque and gotten lost in the futile search for the world famous Albuquerque Holiday Inn.

This of course makes little sense. Please refer to previous post where I state that I am sick and unfocussed. I have personally walked that tightrope of wanting to write what I feel, what I think, and what I wish others would (well frankly) get through their heads. I have also fallen prey to the monster of ego.

Ooh, what do people think of my content? Should I censor that thought? Should I just post or should I let shimmeringjemmy edit though it first so it actually looks like English?

Blogging (in my eyes, YMMV) was intended as a tool to write and to publish. Inevitably, a tool created for one purpose will inevitably be used in any manner regardless of the designer’s intent. Motion pictures begot Television begot Television Advertising begot Infomercials. We can be assured that the pioneers of HTML and javascript really had no aspiration that one day their technology might make it easy to pop-under X-10 cameras or autolink Orbitz flash games to a travel site.

A tool is what you make of it. If you want to juggle chain-saws rather than cut down trees with them, I’m pretty sure without proper care and training, you will find the practice fairly ‘armless. (I have no idea why I felt the need to go there). Likewise, blogging can be informative, it can be fluff, or it can be a tool to further an internet presence with absolutely no real content at all.

I took the time to actually speak to the founder of Blogebrity… or at least the razor toothed-icon that represented the Blogebrity presence on AIM. The system really seems to try to work in a method similar to the Neilsen system… At least when that rating system worked. Lists are generated by readership and link-throughs. So.. how many people are reading a blog and more importantly, taking something from it.

This system seems fair enough. And the little-razor-toothed-icon-avatar-of-Blogebrity was friendly enough. Eventually, they hope to have a list for every blog out there. I noted that the statement seemed to carry the need for classic horror lighting and thunder. The question becomes… does the rating and categorization of blogs and blog content devalue that content. Do we run the risk of performance anxiety? (Oh, I so wanted to link a picture of Cindy Brady in the classic stage fright stare)

The answer, much like going to the elves for counsel, is both Yes and No. Like the arrival of AOL on the internet, you will increase the gene pool, no matter how dearly some of it really needs to be flushed. Good stuff will get better, bad stuff will get worse.

Theoretically, however, Blogebrity will find a way to filter the Whedonesque genius of small but intense followings from the hive-minded banality of the masses waiting to see if Chandler will wear a monkey again this season. Or maybe not. In truth, I’m really not sure it actually matters. *grin*

But hey, maybe I’m missing my chance at realllllll virtual stardom. If you think so, feel free to write the little razor-tooth’ed icon at blogebrity@gmail.com or talk to the icon yourself on AIM.

Personally, I’m going back to scarfing Ricola.

Edit: I did in fact successfully make my saving throw. At no point in my conversation with Blogrebity did I pitch my journal 🙂