Tag Archive: brain


Back in June, I posted twice about the fact that my Genealogy software project was putting me to sleep whenever I worked on it.

I had another bout of impending narcolepsy this morning. But this one was different. I was thinking through and algorithm to solve an issue. Now, it’s been a fairly long 2 weeks for me. As I rode the bus, the answer assembled itself in my head. I hit a very zen place, mentally. I started to dance with the answer around a fire burning in a campground.

Yes… I started to doze off. But in the past where it’s been a system of.. “Stop thinking about this”.. now it’s more of a “Zen, happy path of solution.”

Kinda weird… but worth the mention.

… when the only thing going through your head is “Simon and Garfunkle” as sung by the B52s

“Hello darkness my old Friend!!!”

ooookay.. one of those mornings.

Just felt the need to share.

(Preface: this post is seasoned with a bunch of links. I recommend taking the time to look at the links because it helps explain and compliment the post)

Occasionally, I post strange fun facts that seem to come out of absolutely nowhere.

For example: The term “Pediddel” (Meaning a car missing a headlight) in fact originates to a 1984 episode of “Not Necessarily the News” with its usual segment of Rich Hall’s Sniglets.

Some of you may think… What the hell is ‘Pedidel?’; Some might think, “Pedidel was a sniglet?’

The real question is, “This is the sh&# that Andrei researches?”

So… If you’ve ever seen the episode of Pinky and the Brain where the response is, “I think so, Brain, but what if the hippopotamus won’t wear the beach thong.”… or even if you haven’t…

Here’s where my brain came from.

I was flipping thru youtube videos and saw a shot of a young girl. Maybe 13-15. It made me think of the one young girl I’d seen on TV that I’d really like to see again. Mary Lou Retton in 1984 taking a perfect score of 10 on the vault. Well, from there it was Torvill and Dean skating to Bolero. This got me wanting to find “ABC’s Wide World of Sports.”… I knew I’d see “Agony of Defeat” but… I actually wanted to see the whole thing.

I found it, But it was part of an interview with Jim McKay concerning “The agony of defeat.” This took me to WikiPedia to look up more about Vinko Bogataj, the man known to most Americans (Over 25) as “The agony of defeat.”

This is where I felt inclined to make one of my posts. Talking about the famed “Agony of defeat.” A man who received a standing ovation at a high class banquet for the 25th anniversary of ABC’s sport show. The ovation confused him, because in his native Yugoslavia he never really got a lot of notice. In the States on the other hand… living legend.

It turns out that Bogataj’s mishap is commemorated with a sniglet “Agonosis” meaning, “The syndrome of tuning in on Wide World of Sports every weekend just to watch the skier rack himself.”

Well, okay.. an accidental click there in wikipedia on Sniglets and there it is. “Pediddel”

My first thought was, “So that’s how it’s spelled.”

I think it was one of those driving games I learned by rote… And by an ironic twist was a word I discovered that until now, I’d never… um… “Wrote”.

The next thought was, ‘So it actually started as a sniglet. That’s kinda cool.’ Well, cool from my point of view.

And this is what I do when sick on the couch.

I blame motive_nuance

I won’t say more than simply:
http://n.nfshost.com

And then… I dare you.

The comments to this post may be your only hope 😉

Your brain: 140% interpersonal, 100% visual, 60% verbal, and 100% mathematical!
Congratulations on being 400% smart! Actually, on my test, everyone is. The above score breaks down what kind of thinking you most enjoy doing. A score above 100% means you use that kind of thinking more than average, and a score below 100% means you use it less. It says nothing about how good you are at any one, just how interested you are in each, relatively. A substantial difference in scores between two people means, conclusively, that they are different kinds of thinkers.

Matching Summary: Each of us has different tastes. Still, I offer the following advice, which I think is obvious:

  1. Don’t date someone if your interpersonal percentages differ by more than 80%.
  2. Don’t be friends with someone if your verbal percentages differ by more than 100%.
  3. Don’t have sex with someone if their math percentage is over 200%.

My test tracked 4 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:

free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 97% on interpersonal
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 61% on visual
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 57% on verbal
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 60% on mathematical

Link: The 4-Variable IQ Test written by chriscoyne on Ok Cupid

Easy LoverChinese Wall